Total Commodity Programs in Washington County, Utah, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 187
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Washington County, Utah totaled $3,147,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Edward L Bowler | Saint George, UT 84790 | $34,222 |
22 | Larry T Blake | Saint George, UT 84770 | $32,240 |
23 | Milo Ence And Sons LLC | Ivins, UT 84738 | $31,344 |
24 | Kyle Frei | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $30,716 |
25 | Colette Wadsworth | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $29,946 |
26 | The Amended & Restated Delmont Wa | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $29,366 |
27 | R & K Staheli Farms Lc | Loma, CO 81524 | $29,067 |
28 | David Hafen | Ivins, UT 84738 | $27,734 |
29 | Zackary W Frei | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $26,474 |
30 | F Nadine R Wallace Trust | West Haven, UT 84401 | $26,303 |
31 | David J Evans | St George, UT 84770 | $24,960 |
32 | John Wadsworth | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $23,711 |
33 | David R Jordan | Washington, UT 84780 | $23,588 |
34 | Kelly Blake | Saint George, UT 84790 | $23,533 |
35 | Denice J Hughes | Saint George, UT 84790 | $22,999 |
36 | Thomas Gubler Properties LLC | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $22,465 |
37 | Dennis Frei | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $21,703 |
38 | Grassy Flat Land & Livestock | Central, UT 84722 | $20,780 |
39 | Slowcow LLC | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $20,317 |
40 | Mark Olsen | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $19,665 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”