Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Utah
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Utah, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 444
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Utah totaled $23,751,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arlin S Hughes | Veyo, UT 84782 | $1,121,920 |
2 | Evans Beefmasters Inc | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $813,817 |
3 | Plateau Ranches LLC | Kanab, UT 84741 | $779,552 |
4 | Rudger C Atkin Inc | Saint George, UT 84790 | $683,685 |
5 | Fenton Bowler | Veyo, UT 84782 | $666,474 |
6 | C & L Farm & Cattle LLC | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $579,393 |
7 | William M Gubler | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $559,240 |
8 | Gubler Ranch LLC | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $553,615 |
9 | Denice J Hughes | Saint George, UT 84790 | $548,508 |
10 | Edward L Bowler | Saint George, UT 84790 | $547,375 |
11 | William D Wright | Milford, UT 84751 | $436,364 |
12 | Reed Spendlove And Sons | Virgin, UT 84779 | $418,600 |
13 | Spendlove Farms And Livestock, LLC | Virgin, UT 84779 | $395,505 |
14 | Jones Boys Ranches LLC | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $330,992 |
15 | Larry T Blake | Saint George, UT 84770 | $302,831 |
16 | Kyle Frei | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $273,432 |
17 | Kelly Blake | Saint George, UT 84790 | $204,430 |
18 | D & R Ranch Inc | St George, UT 84770 | $202,057 |
19 | Jeff Esplin | Saint George, UT 84790 | $191,512 |
20 | Saucer Five Limited Partnership | Central, UT 84722 | $191,014 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>