Total Commodity Programs in Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,358
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Vermont totaled $361,661,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | H J & A Howrigan & Sons Inc | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $3,280,211 |
2 | Four Hills Farm | Bristol, VT 05443 | $3,249,112 |
3 | Nop Brothers & Sons | Plainview, TX 79072 | $3,247,694 |
4 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,989,166 |
5 | Barnes Black & Whiteface Ranch Llp | Addison, VT 05491 | $2,965,525 |
6 | Mark & Amanda St Pierre | Richford, VT 05476 | $2,665,460 |
7 | Dubois Farm Inc | Addison, VT 05491 | $2,522,009 |
8 | Blue Spruce Farm Inc | Bridport, VT 05734 | $2,312,379 |
9 | Knoxland Farm Inc | Bradford, VT 05033 | $2,170,557 |
10 | Vorsteveld Farm Llp | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $2,107,637 |
11 | Newmont Farm LLC | Bradford, VT 05033 | $2,098,000 |
12 | Bess-view Farm | Swanton, VT 05488 | $2,086,411 |
13 | Fairmont LLC | E Montpelier, VT 05651 | $2,017,900 |
14 | Westminster Farms Inc | Westminster Station, VT 05159 | $1,857,598 |
15 | Gervais Family Farm Inc | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $1,857,500 |
16 | Nelson Dairies West LLC | Swanton, VT 05488 | $1,847,843 |
17 | Chaput Family Farms | North Troy, VT 05859 | $1,816,013 |
18 | Kayhart Brothers LLC | Addison, VT 05491 | $1,809,931 |
19 | Goodrich Farm Inc | Salisbury, VT 05769 | $1,723,752 |
20 | Gray Farms | Derby, VT 05829 | $1,684,947 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>