Counter Cyclical Program in Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,337
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Vermont totaled $5,354,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Eric Dandurand | Franklin, VT 05457 | $27,503 |
22 | Remi Bourdeau | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $27,408 |
23 | Foster Bros Farm Inc | Middlebury, VT 05753 | $27,069 |
24 | Pine Hill View Farm II LLC | Bennington, VT 05201 | $26,781 |
25 | Donald Bessette | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $26,006 |
26 | L F Hurtubise & Sons Inc | Richford, VT 05476 | $26,003 |
27 | Jason Boissoneault | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $25,498 |
28 | Quesnels Holsteins Inc | Whiting, VT 05778 | $25,467 |
29 | Montagne Brothers | Swanton, VT 05488 | $24,892 |
30 | Savage View Farm | Grand Isle, VT 05458 | $24,682 |
31 | Michael Montagne | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $24,354 |
32 | Andre P Quintin | North Hero, VT 05474 | $24,245 |
33 | Vern-mont Farm LLC | Vernon, VT 05354 | $24,231 |
34 | Randall & Suzanne Pilon | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $23,904 |
35 | Rowley Brothers Dairy LLC | Milton, VT 05468 | $23,820 |
36 | G Palardy Farm | Alburg, VT 05440 | $22,942 |
37 | Ronald J & Cheryl Machia | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $22,666 |
38 | Gray Farms | Derby, VT 05829 | $21,770 |
39 | Conants' Riverside Farms LLC | Richmond, VT 05477 | $21,752 |
40 | Sunset Lake Farm LLC | South Burlington, VT 05403 | $21,717 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”