Counter Cyclical Program in Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,337
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Vermont totaled $5,354,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Pouliot Donald & Dale | Westford, VT 05494 | $17,128 |
62 | Magnan Bros Dairy Inc | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $17,081 |
63 | Scribner Farm | Montpelier, VT 05602 | $16,924 |
64 | Deer Flats Farm, LLC | West Pawlet, VT 05775 | $16,817 |
65 | Fillmore Farms LLC | Bennington, VT 05201 | $16,725 |
66 | Newton J Reynolds | Alburg, VT 05440 | $16,381 |
67 | Robert Mack | Green Valley, AZ 85614 | $16,204 |
68 | Robert & Linda Sweet | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $16,098 |
69 | Vorsteveld Farm Llp | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $16,083 |
70 | Richard R Marszalkowski | Panton, VT 05491 | $16,044 |
71 | Dawn Marszalkowski | Panton, VT 05491 | $16,044 |
72 | Douglas A Nelson Jr | Swanton, VT 05488 | $15,907 |
73 | John & Joyce Belter | South Burlington, VT 05403 | $15,774 |
74 | Bryant & Bryant Partnership | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $15,710 |
75 | Stoneholm Farm LLC | Putney, VT 05346 | $15,632 |
76 | Mead Farms LLC | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $15,266 |
77 | Champlainside Farm Partnership | Bridport, VT 05734 | $15,264 |
78 | Breezy Valley Farm Partnership | St George, VT 05495 | $15,260 |
79 | Russell Lanphear & Son Farm | Hyde Park, VT 05655 | $15,229 |
80 | Stephen & Shirley Harrness | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $14,966 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”