Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Vermont, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 474
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Vermont totaled $289,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Terri L Bryce | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $1,000 |
82 | Lawson Douglas & Manon | Irasburg, VT 05845 | $1,000 |
83 | Monte Kennedy | West Charleston, VT 05872 | $1,000 |
84 | Robillard Flats Farm Inc | Irasburg, VT 05845 | $1,000 |
85 | Hall And Breen Farm LLC | Orwell, VT 05760 | $1,000 |
86 | Sogle Property LLC | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $1,000 |
87 | Jamie Rivers | Newport, VT 05855 | $1,000 |
88 | Randall Family Farm , LLC | North Troy, VT 05859 | $1,000 |
89 | John Cushman | Waterville, VT 05492 | $1,000 |
90 | Adrian Fortin | Newport, VT 05855 | $1,000 |
91 | Kelly R Stone | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $991 |
92 | Wilbur Farms LLC | Whiting, VT 05778 | $983 |
93 | Sunrise Organic Farm LLC | White River Junction, VT 05001 | $950 |
94 | John Reynolds | East Hardwick, VT 05836 | $938 |
95 | Marcel & Gaetane Patenaude | Derby Line, VT 05830 | $922 |
96 | Eden's Echo Forest Management Co | Eden Mills, VT 05653 | $913 |
97 | Misty-anne Koloski | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $906 |
98 | Godfreys Sugar House | Montgomery Center, VT 05471 | $905 |
99 | Two Brothers Maple LLC | Richford, VT 05476 | $904 |
100 | Cochran Family Maple Farm LLC | Richmond, VT 05477 | $888 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”