Market Loss Assistance Program in Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,841
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Vermont totaled $26,902,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kennland Farms Inc | Panton, VT 05491 | $40,935 |
82 | Fryslan Farm | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $40,705 |
83 | Samuel Visser | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $40,684 |
84 | Barnes Bros | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $40,672 |
85 | Frederick & Betty Ryan | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $40,604 |
86 | Quarry Road Farms Inc | Middlebury, VT 05753 | $40,504 |
87 | Richard & Julie Longway | Swanton, VT 05488 | $40,149 |
88 | Walter M Gladstone | Bradford, VT 05033 | $40,004 |
89 | Robillard Flats Farm Inc | Irasburg, VT 05845 | $39,749 |
90 | Brian Rowell Dba Rowell Farms | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $39,684 |
91 | Peter Miller | Vernon, VT 05354 | $39,578 |
92 | Keith Family Farm | Elmore, VT 05661 | $39,502 |
93 | Norman & Lena Mcallister | Franklin, VT 05457 | $39,367 |
94 | Ledge Haven Farm | Orwell, VT 05760 | $39,322 |
95 | John Quintin | North Hero, VT 05474 | $39,139 |
96 | Stephen Harrness | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $39,080 |
97 | Laggis Farm LLC | East Hardwick, VT 05836 | $38,982 |
98 | Farr Family Farm | Richmond, VT 05477 | $38,654 |
99 | Paul & Rosemary Gingue | Waterford, VT 05819 | $38,566 |
100 | Andre Gagne | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $38,559 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”