Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 528
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Vermont totaled $5,356,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Carol D Cuthbertson | Danville, VT 05828 | $17,500 |
82 | Matthew R Mcnall | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $17,356 |
83 | Margaret Ryan | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $17,250 |
84 | Mark Gagne | Swanton, VT 05488 | $17,087 |
85 | Brent Beidler | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $17,064 |
86 | John F Mcmahon Sr | Petersburg, NY 12138 | $16,869 |
87 | James Brown | Derby, VT 05829 | $16,796 |
88 | David Daggett | Derby, VT 05829 | $16,780 |
89 | Graham Farms | Williamstown, VT 05679 | $16,223 |
90 | Leo Henry | Alburg, VT 05440 | $16,137 |
91 | Normand Lussier | Swanton, VT 05488 | $16,098 |
92 | Silver Birch Equestrian Center In | Brandon, VT 05733 | $16,038 |
93 | Sharon Faylor Ling | Hardwick, VT 05843 | $15,800 |
94 | Michael Daly | Lyndonville, VT 05851 | $15,768 |
95 | Gretchen Daly | Lyndonville, VT 05851 | $15,764 |
96 | Felix's Free Spirit Farm Inc | Shaftsbury, VT 05262 | $15,621 |
97 | Rod Hewitt | Rockingham, VT 05101 | $15,523 |
98 | Walter Bothfeld Trust | Cabot, VT 05647 | $15,472 |
99 | Lee Barrup | West Charleston, VT 05872 | $15,431 |
100 | Durwood Blay | Westfield, VT 05874 | $15,408 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”