Margin Protection Program in Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 620
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in Vermont totaled $7,151,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Gosliga Farm Inc | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $25,716 |
102 | Clarence Deering | Bridport, VT 05734 | $25,662 |
103 | Taft, Bruce & Mary | Huntington, VT 05462 | $25,430 |
104 | Robillard Flats Farm Inc | Irasburg, VT 05845 | $25,073 |
105 | Mountain View Dairy | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $24,874 |
106 | Woodlawn Holsteins, LLC | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $24,837 |
107 | Tanguay Dairy Farm | Brunswick, VT 05905 | $24,798 |
108 | Don Sim Farm Partnership Llp | Sutton, VT 05867 | $24,560 |
109 | Dale C Briggs | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $24,306 |
110 | L & L Farms Inc | Morrisville, VT 05661 | $24,087 |
111 | Leon & Linda Benoit | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $23,954 |
112 | Peter Decker | Morgan, VT 05853 | $23,497 |
113 | Sunderland Farm Inc | Bridport, VT 05734 | $23,313 |
114 | Michael Ferris | Randolph, VT 05060 | $23,077 |
115 | Wayne M Stearns Jr | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $22,980 |
116 | Guy Clark III | Cambridge, NY 12816 | $22,800 |
117 | Meadowbrook Acres Inc | Milton, VT 05468 | $22,793 |
118 | Tommary Holsteins | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $22,547 |
119 | Visser Brothers Farm | Panton, VT 05491 | $22,151 |
120 | Topnotch Holsteins | Derby, VT 05829 | $21,925 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”