Farm Subsidy information
Vermont
Total Subsidies in Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 7,593
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Vermont totaled $490,421,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Mountain View Dairy | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $673,210 |
122 | Harkdale Farms Inc | Newbury, VT 05051 | $671,163 |
123 | Dean Wright Dba Wright Farm | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $662,086 |
124 | Brad D Thomas | Shoreham, VT 05770 | $652,335 |
125 | Tanguay Dairy Farm | Brunswick, VT 05905 | $635,669 |
126 | Ledge Haven Farm | Orwell, VT 05760 | $631,530 |
127 | Lucas Dairy LLC | Orwell, VT 05760 | $631,474 |
128 | Robert & Suzanne Hunt | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $629,974 |
129 | Savage View Farm | Grand Isle, VT 05458 | $624,024 |
130 | Michael Montagne | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $617,908 |
131 | Wayside Meadow Livestock LLC | Ryegate, VT 05042 | $608,561 |
132 | Bernard & Joanne Guillemette | Shelburne, VT 05482 | $606,486 |
133 | Timstead Farms Inc | South Hero, VT 05486 | $604,571 |
134 | Jeff & Lise Fifield | Middlebury, VT 05753 | $601,067 |
135 | Ridgeview Farm Inc | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $598,845 |
136 | Leach Farms Inc | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $598,318 |
137 | Jason Boissoneault | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $597,316 |
138 | Burke View Dairies Inc | Sutton, VT 05867 | $594,263 |
139 | Aires-hill Farm Inc | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $591,962 |
140 | Kayhart Farms Inc | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $591,597 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”