Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,498
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Vermont totaled $10,082,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ivy Farms Inc | Swanton, VT 05488 | $14,725 |
122 | Archambault Farms LLC | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $14,702 |
123 | Lewisholm Valley Farm Inc | West Pawlet, VT 05775 | $14,687 |
124 | John & Joyce Belter | South Burlington, VT 05403 | $14,676 |
125 | Dale C Briggs | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $14,635 |
126 | Richard A Parizo | Milton, VT 05468 | $14,578 |
127 | Millborne Farm | Granby, CT 06035 | $14,515 |
128 | Jerry Butler | Bristol, VT 05443 | $14,446 |
129 | Roland G Ayer Jr | North Ferrisburg, VT 05473 | $14,384 |
130 | James Danyow | Ferrisburg, VT 05456 | $14,234 |
131 | Laberge & Sons Inc | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $14,165 |
132 | John & Diana Forgues | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $14,157 |
133 | Stoneholm Farm LLC | Putney, VT 05346 | $14,072 |
134 | J Denis & Claire Michaud | East Hardwick, VT 05836 | $14,018 |
135 | Albert & Lynette Fresn | Swanton, VT 05488 | $14,004 |
136 | Paul J & Karen Parent | Shoreham, VT 05770 | $13,883 |
137 | Ronald J Patenaude | Derby Line, VT 05830 | $13,880 |
138 | Devino Bros | Milton, VT 05468 | $13,854 |
139 | Harold & Larry Sunderland | Bridport, VT 05734 | $13,840 |
140 | Terry & Juliette Rice | Swanton, VT 05488 | $13,812 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”