Market Loss Assistance Program in Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,841
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Vermont totaled $26,902,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Clark Hinsdale Jr | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $36,673 |
122 | David L Russell | Starksboro, VT 05487 | $36,551 |
123 | Champlainside Farm Partnership | Bridport, VT 05734 | $36,451 |
124 | Stone Fred & Sandra | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $36,428 |
125 | James Danyow | Ferrisburg, VT 05456 | $36,422 |
126 | Devries Dairydale Farm | Vergennes, VT 05491 | $36,324 |
127 | Bryce Farms Inc | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $36,263 |
128 | Lussier Bros | Weybridge, VT 05753 | $36,171 |
129 | Real Laroche | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $36,039 |
130 | Kempton Farms | Peacham, VT 05862 | $35,996 |
131 | Dodd Farms | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $35,882 |
132 | Robert & Elizabeth Archambault | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $35,791 |
133 | Richard Hulett Sr | West Pawlet, VT 05775 | $35,755 |
134 | Stonehouse Farms Inc | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $35,543 |
135 | Maplewood Dairy Farm | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $35,434 |
136 | Wilfred & Janet Lamoureux | Whiting, VT 05778 | $35,429 |
137 | Clifford Farm | Starksboro, VT 05487 | $35,364 |
138 | L F Hurtubise & Sons Inc | Richford, VT 05476 | $35,299 |
139 | Snowflake Farm | Alto, MI 49302 | $35,246 |
140 | Gregory & Celeste Kane-stebbins | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $35,231 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”