Wool and Mohair Programs in Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 237
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in Vermont totaled $134,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | John Nopper | Putney, VT 05346 | $19,171 |
2 | William Yates | Brownsville, VT 05037 | $8,692 |
3 | Lydia Ratcliff | Chester, VT 05143 | $5,088 |
4 | Duclos & Thompson Farm | Weybridge, VT 05753 | $4,490 |
5 | Huntington Sheldon | Shelburne, VT 05482 | $3,470 |
6 | Ronald Quick | Crown Point, NY 12928 | $2,546 |
7 | Ted M Riehle | Grand Isle, VT 05458 | $2,434 |
8 | Linda Doane | Roxbury, VT 05669 | $2,405 |
9 | Theodore Nelson | East Ryegate, VT 05042 | $2,367 |
10 | Misty Morning Meadows Inc | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $2,038 |
11 | Cedar Run Farms Inc | Franklin, VT 05457 | $1,880 |
12 | Andrew Abair | Waterbury Center, VT 05677 | $1,836 |
13 | Betty St Hilaire | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $1,642 |
14 | Alfred St Hilaire | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $1,642 |
15 | David R Major | Putney, VT 05346 | $1,563 |
16 | Wooly Hill Farm | Bridport, VT 05734 | $1,561 |
17 | Jean Meade | Morrisville, VT 05661 | $1,544 |
18 | Donald Joslyn | Waitsfield, VT 05673 | $1,466 |
19 | Daniel K Korngiebel | Cuttingsville, VT 05738 | $1,405 |
20 | Frederick W Swift | South Ryegate, VT 05069 | $1,379 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>