Emergency Conservation Program in Addison County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 115
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Addison County, Vermont totaled $296,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Virginia Shaw-wilson | Orwell, VT 05760 | $671 |
82 | Niles Bora | Bristol, VT 05443 | $649 |
83 | Rodney & Deanna Boise | New Haven, VT 05472 | $616 |
84 | Robert Wilbur Estate | Whiting, VT 05778 | $558 |
85 | Mahan Farm Partnership | Hinesburg, VT 05461 | $557 |
86 | Larry Wilbur | Whiting, VT 05778 | $542 |
87 | Michael Wilbur | Whiting, VT 05778 | $541 |
88 | Tony Quenneville | Whiting, VT 05778 | $540 |
89 | David Quenneville | Whiting, VT 05778 | $539 |
90 | Robert & Marolyn Bingham | Middlebury, VT 05753 | $538 |
91 | William Masterson | Lincoln, VT 05443 | $536 |
92 | Jack Whipple | Middlebury, VT 05753 | $516 |
93 | Mark Perrin | Middlebury, VT 05753 | $451 |
94 | Harold S Kittredge | New Haven, VT 05472 | $410 |
95 | John Sherlock | Nokomis, FL 34274 | $400 |
96 | Maurice & Barbara Laframboise | Cornwall, VT 05753 | $385 |
97 | Herman Buzeman | Addison, VT 05491 | $371 |
98 | Peter R Bolduc | New Haven, VT 05472 | $369 |
99 | Judith E Giusto | Ferrisburgh, VT 05456 | $368 |
100 | Harley & Marilyn Grice | Middlebury, VT 05753 | $363 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”