Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Caledonia County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 78
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Caledonia County, Vermont totaled $463,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Howard H Bennett | Saint Johnsbury, VT 05819 | $2,420 |
42 | Judith H Clifford | West Danville, VT 05873 | $2,240 |
43 | Francis J Clifford II | West Danville, VT 05873 | $2,240 |
44 | Brian & Kathleen Somers | Barnet, VT 05821 | $2,154 |
45 | Adam Beaulieu | Wells River, VT 05081 | $2,098 |
46 | Moses Roy | East Ryegate, VT 05042 | $1,976 |
47 | Rick Clough | South Ryegate, VT 05069 | $1,817 |
48 | Kelly A Clough | South Ryegate, VT 05069 | $1,817 |
49 | Hayden Tanner Jr | Sutton, VT 05867 | $1,797 |
50 | North Hardwick Dairy LLC | Hardwick, VT 05843 | $1,780 |
51 | Henry Pearl | Danville, VT 05828 | $1,739 |
52 | Eric Bean | West Danville, VT 05873 | $1,627 |
53 | Dwayne K Marceau | Peacham, VT 05862 | $1,575 |
54 | Deborah J Marceau | Peacham, VT 05862 | $1,575 |
55 | Lady Bug Farm Partnership | Hardwick, VT 05843 | $1,546 |
56 | Mount Hunger Jerseys | East Burke, VT 05832 | $1,506 |
57 | Adam Joseph Beaulieu | Wells River, VT 05081 | $1,260 |
58 | Gordon W Murray | East Ryegate, VT 05042 | $1,259 |
59 | Kirby View Farm LLC | Lyndonville, VT 05851 | $1,258 |
60 | Stony Valley Farm | St Johnsbury, VT 05819 | $1,219 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”