Total Commodity Programs in Caledonia County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 511
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Caledonia County, Vermont totaled $19,924,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Simpson Farm | Sutton, VT 05867 | $1,424,033 |
2 | Laggis Farm LLC | East Hardwick, VT 05836 | $926,188 |
3 | J Denis & Claire Michaud | East Hardwick, VT 05836 | $833,933 |
4 | Don Sim Farm Partnership Llp | Sutton, VT 05867 | $739,130 |
5 | Kempton Farms Inc | Peacham, VT 05862 | $714,124 |
6 | Wayside Meadow Livestock LLC | Ryegate, VT 05042 | $608,561 |
7 | Lucky Hill Farm Llp | Danville, VT 05828 | $534,375 |
8 | Burke View Dairies Inc | Sutton, VT 05867 | $466,893 |
9 | Bruce & Catherine Roy | East Ryegate, VT 05042 | $367,023 |
10 | Scotch Burn Farm LLC | East Ryegate, VT 05042 | $361,677 |
11 | Paul & Rosemary Gingue | Waterford, VT 05819 | $309,840 |
12 | Sylvain Farm LLC | St Johnsbury, VT 05819 | $299,806 |
13 | Bruce & Gail Nelson | East Ryegate, VT 05042 | $287,736 |
14 | Willson Acres LLC | Waterford, VT 05819 | $270,419 |
15 | Harold Webster | Danville, VT 05828 | $250,811 |
16 | Solinsky Farm | Sutton, VT 05867 | $242,205 |
17 | William & Grant Nelson Farm | Ryegate, VT 05042 | $221,857 |
18 | James Beattie | Danville, VT 05828 | $199,755 |
19 | William & Jennifer Nelson | Ryegate, VT 05042 | $199,620 |
20 | Thomas R Simmer | Barnet, VT 05821 | $197,778 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>