Emergency Conservation Program in Chittenden County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 102
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Chittenden County, Vermont totaled $675,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gabriel M O'malley | Waterbury, VT 05676 | $8,072 |
22 | Cottonwood Stables LLC | Colchester, VT 05446 | $7,726 |
23 | James Ritchie | Richmond, VT 05477 | $6,885 |
24 | John & Joyce Belter | South Burlington, VT 05403 | $6,525 |
25 | Paul Mazza's Fruit & Vegetable St | Colchester, VT 05446 | $6,469 |
26 | Marjorie T Palmer | Shelburne, VT 05482 | $6,451 |
27 | Robert Titus | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $6,153 |
28 | Joseph Jordan | Essex Jct, VT 05452 | $5,818 |
29 | Mark Fuller | Richmond, VT 05477 | $5,803 |
30 | Walker's Vermont Pure Maple Syrup | Underhill, VT 05489 | $5,531 |
31 | Andrew Aldrich | Huntington, VT 05462 | $5,451 |
32 | E W Rawson & Son | Jericho, VT 05465 | $5,440 |
33 | Philippe Cote | Richmond, VT 05477 | $5,011 |
34 | Clark Hinsdale Jr | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $5,000 |
35 | Jacob & Hanny Verburg | Richmond, VT 05477 | $5,000 |
36 | Richard A Parizo | Milton, VT 05468 | $5,000 |
37 | Bernard Comeau | Williston, VT 05495 | $4,499 |
38 | Conants' Riverside Farms LLC | Richmond, VT 05477 | $4,410 |
39 | Samuel Paul Mazza II | Colchester, VT 05446 | $4,363 |
40 | Marjorie Major | S Burlington, VT 05403 | $4,346 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”