Loan Deficiency in Chittenden County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 80
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Chittenden County, Vermont totaled $918,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Edward J Robinson | Milton, VT 05468 | $13,891 |
22 | Meadowbrook Acres Inc | Milton, VT 05468 | $13,818 |
23 | Fitzgerald Farm | Colchester, VT 05446 | $12,977 |
24 | Taft, Bruce & Mary | Huntington, VT 05462 | $12,830 |
25 | Huntington Sheldon | Shelburne, VT 05482 | $10,892 |
26 | Mountain View Dairy | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $10,617 |
27 | Cottonwood Stables LLC | Colchester, VT 05446 | $10,544 |
28 | Thibault Bros | Colchester, VT 05446 | $10,400 |
29 | Twin Oaks Dairy Farm LLC | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $9,959 |
30 | Honey Gardens Apiaries Inc | Hinesburg, VT 05461 | $9,481 |
31 | University Of Vt | S. Burlington, VT 05403 | $8,846 |
32 | Riverhill Farms Inc | Williston, VT 05495 | $7,664 |
33 | John & Ann Rowley | Milton, VT 05468 | $7,443 |
34 | Mark Boyden | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $6,764 |
35 | Clifford Farm | Starksboro, VT 05487 | $6,732 |
36 | Johnny Brook Farm LLC | Richmond, VT 05477 | $6,280 |
37 | Meadow Brook Acres | Milton, VT 05468 | $6,267 |
38 | Roland G Ayer Jr | North Ferrisburg, VT 05473 | $4,491 |
39 | Richard Bell | Constable, NY 12926 | $4,419 |
40 | Murray Thompson | Colchester, VT 05446 | $4,193 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”