Total Disaster Programs in Chittenden County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 264
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Chittenden County, Vermont totaled $4,742,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jeff Boissoneault | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $18,500 |
62 | , | $18,147 | |
63 | Janine Ndagijimana | Burlington, VT 05408 | $17,357 |
64 | Farr Family Farm | Richmond, VT 05477 | $16,927 |
65 | Amber Ridge Maple LLC | Essex Jct, VT 05452 | $16,542 |
66 | Mary J Thibault | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $16,412 |
67 | Tropical Edibles | S Burlington, VT 05403 | $15,757 |
68 | , | $15,637 | |
69 | Earle A Matthews | Essex Junction, VT 05452 | $15,635 |
70 | Terri L Bryce | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $15,495 |
71 | Fredrick R Howard | Westford, VT 05494 | $15,436 |
72 | Pauline Howard | Westford, VT 05494 | $15,436 |
73 | Nicholas D Merritt | E Fairfield, VT 05448 | $15,125 |
74 | Huntington Sheldon | Shelburne, VT 05482 | $14,828 |
75 | Ronnie & Carol Sweet | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $14,249 |
76 | Leo O'brien III | Shelburne, VT 05482 | $13,990 |
77 | Robert Titus | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $13,856 |
78 | Samuel Paul Mazza II | Colchester, VT 05446 | $13,553 |
79 | Alexander Bushey-white | Essex, VT 05451 | $13,399 |
80 | Mack Farms Inc | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $13,361 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”