Emergency Conservation Program in Chittenden County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 102
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Chittenden County, Vermont totaled $675,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cowie Mountain Maple Inc | Underhill, VT 05489 | $76,634 |
2 | Wm Dave Davis | Underhill, VT 05489 | $46,019 |
3 | R M Hill LLC | Underhill, VT 05489 | $45,152 |
4 | J William Butler | Underhill, VT 05489 | $30,162 |
5 | Pouliot Donald & Dale | Westford, VT 05494 | $26,430 |
6 | Robert Lemire | Essex Junction, VT 05452 | $25,770 |
7 | Taft, Bruce & Mary | Huntington, VT 05462 | $25,654 |
8 | David Cadreact | Milton, VT 05468 | $19,032 |
9 | Jason Boissoneault | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $16,655 |
10 | Amber Ridge Maple LLC | Essex Jct, VT 05452 | $16,542 |
11 | Terri L Bryce | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $15,495 |
12 | Nicholas D Merritt | E Fairfield, VT 05448 | $15,125 |
13 | Moultroup Jeffrey & Deborah | Richmond, VT 05477 | $14,702 |
14 | Alexander Bushey-white | Essex, VT 05451 | $13,399 |
15 | Herbert A Neill | Jericho, VT 05465 | $11,077 |
16 | Benjamin C Butler | Underhill, VT 05489 | $10,858 |
17 | Riverbend Farm, LLC | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $10,050 |
18 | Tristan N Butler | Underhill, VT 05489 | $9,512 |
19 | , | $9,416 | |
20 | Leslie Moore | Westford, VT 05494 | $8,504 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>