Farm Subsidy information
Chittenden County, Vermont
Total Subsidies in Chittenden County, Vermont, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 508
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chittenden County, Vermont totaled $22,644,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David Tucker | Westford, VT 05494 | $144,923 |
42 | Cowie Mountain Maple Inc | Underhill, VT 05489 | $139,356 |
43 | Aurora Farms LLC | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $127,202 |
44 | Matthew T Baldwin | Hinesburg, VT 05461 | $127,106 |
45 | Lapierre Dairy Farm | Shelburne, VT 05482 | $120,018 |
46 | David Cadreact | Milton, VT 05468 | $114,024 |
47 | Laberge Brothers Dairy LLC | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $112,523 |
48 | Foote Family Farm LLC | Hinesburg, VT 05461 | $108,357 |
49 | Murray Thompson | Colchester, VT 05446 | $107,933 |
50 | Pitchfork Farm LLC | Burlington, VT 05402 | $102,907 |
51 | Towne & Roberts Family Farm | Milton, VT 05468 | $94,930 |
52 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $94,143 |
53 | Fontaine Michael & Daniel | Williston, VT 05495 | $94,141 |
54 | Jericho Settlers' Farm Inc | Jericho, VT 05465 | $93,471 |
55 | Johnny Brook Farm LLC | Richmond, VT 05477 | $92,976 |
56 | Rawson Farm | Underhill, VT 05489 | $90,795 |
57 | Ernest Auclair | South Burlington, VT 05403 | $89,184 |
58 | Earle A Matthews | Essex Junction, VT 05452 | $88,466 |
59 | Charles P Proutt | Charlotte, VT 05445 | $88,117 |
60 | Burnt Rock Farm LLC | Huntington, VT 05462 | $85,373 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”