Farm Subsidy information
Essex County, Vermont
Total Subsidies in Essex County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 128
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Essex County, Vermont totaled $6,959,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Carl Blaisdell | North Haverhill, NH 03774 | $7,350 |
62 | Heather Lefoll | Maidstone, VT 05905 | $6,813 |
63 | Verda Carpenter | Poolesville, MD 20837 | $6,450 |
64 | Forbes Family Partnership Dba Forbes Farm Partners | Lancaster, NH 03584 | $6,182 |
65 | Donald Amadon | Lunenburg, VT 05906 | $5,866 |
66 | Leola Amadon | Lunenburg, VT 05906 | $5,866 |
67 | Plum Creek Marketing Inc | Crossett, AR 71635 | $5,750 |
68 | Edna M Young | Guildhall, VT 05905 | $5,542 |
69 | Allan Ashman | East Charleston, VT 05833 | $5,542 |
70 | Rebecca Ashman | East Charleston, VT 05833 | $5,542 |
71 | Kingdom Cattle LLC | Canaan, VT 05903 | $5,098 |
72 | Janice L Peaslee Trust | Guildhall, VT 05905 | $4,022 |
73 | Meryl F Mekeel | Lunenburg, VT 05906 | $3,836 |
74 | Eugene Sage | Island Pond, VT 05846 | $3,661 |
75 | Lane P Nevins | Lunenburg, VT 05906 | $3,629 |
76 | Diana Jeffrey | Lemington, VT 05903 | $3,507 |
77 | Daniel A Bushey | Canaan, VT 05903 | $3,470 |
78 | Donald Plumley | Guildhall, VT 05905 | $3,357 |
79 | Angelo C Vozzella | Lunenburg, VT 05906 | $3,228 |
80 | Charles White & Sons | Colebrook, NH 03576 | $2,948 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”