Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, Vermont
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,571
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $128,618,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Stebbinshire Farms Inc | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $847,551 |
22 | Albert & Lynette Fresn | Swanton, VT 05488 | $841,988 |
23 | Bourbeau & Sons Inc | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $812,619 |
24 | Copper Hill Farm, LLC | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $805,397 |
25 | Patrick & Paula Howrigan | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $765,291 |
26 | Brian Rowell Dba Rowell Farms | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $734,878 |
27 | Robert P Parent And Son LLC | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $725,112 |
28 | David & Peggy Howrigan | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $720,344 |
29 | Magnan Bros Maquam Shore Dairy LLC | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $706,658 |
30 | Ronald J & Cheryl Machia | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $702,036 |
31 | S&b Bessette Dairy LLC | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $695,638 |
32 | Duhamel Family Farm LLC | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $680,458 |
33 | Dean Wright Dba Wright Farm | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $662,086 |
34 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $652,710 |
35 | Mountain View Dairy | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $636,368 |
36 | Michael Montagne | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $617,908 |
37 | Ridgeview Farm Inc | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $598,845 |
38 | Leach Farms Inc | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $598,318 |
39 | Aires-hill Farm Inc | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $591,962 |
40 | Laroche Dairy & Son LLC | Highgate Ctr, VT 05459 | $559,027 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”