Conservation Reserve Program in Franklin County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 92
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $2,676,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Claude Rainville | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $41,141 |
22 | Tyler G Webb | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $39,849 |
23 | Tyrone Shaw | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $38,902 |
24 | Grant John & Kathleen & Daniel Gorton | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $38,772 |
25 | Jb3 LLC | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $37,550 |
26 | Jacques & Mariel Parent | Swanton, VT 05488 | $36,747 |
27 | Casimer Todd Sudol | Colchester, VT 05446 | $34,472 |
28 | Gervais Family Farm Inc | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $34,056 |
29 | Kinney Flood Acres LLC | East Berkshire, VT 05447 | $33,401 |
30 | Howrigans H Bar 9 Dairy, LLC | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $32,728 |
31 | Carol Sweet | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $32,178 |
32 | Wynn &or Pauline Paradee | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $29,921 |
33 | August Haberstroh | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $28,218 |
34 | Larry Trombley | Swanton, VT 05488 | $24,835 |
35 | Suzanne Marie Parent | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $23,958 |
36 | Philip L Parent | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $23,946 |
37 | Ronald Hibbard | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $23,373 |
38 | Robin Hibbard | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $23,362 |
39 | Gilles W Rainville | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $22,480 |
40 | , | $22,366 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”