Total Conservation Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 266
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $5,092,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rockledge Maple Trust | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $60,812 |
22 | Bessette Farms LLC | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $59,770 |
23 | Carol Dunsmore | Swanton, VT 05488 | $58,514 |
24 | Rene Boissoneault | Swanton, VT 05488 | $56,014 |
25 | Raymond Kinney | East Berkshire, VT 05447 | $55,420 |
26 | Kathleen Richards-babcock | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $53,305 |
27 | Carolyn Boomhower | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $52,546 |
28 | Adrian & Marie Rainville | Franklin, VT 05457 | $51,952 |
29 | Nicole Lapierre | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $49,678 |
30 | Michael Benjamin | Franklin, VT 05457 | $47,711 |
31 | J Christopher Wagner | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $46,233 |
32 | Edward & Carol Mahoney | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $42,996 |
33 | Rick Russell | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $42,224 |
34 | Claude Rainville | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $41,141 |
35 | Joseph & Annette Montagne | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $40,057 |
36 | Henry Choiniere | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $39,566 |
37 | Tyrone Shaw | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $38,902 |
38 | Grant John & Kathleen & Daniel Gorton | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $38,772 |
39 | David Marchant | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $37,841 |
40 | Jb3 LLC | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $37,550 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”