Miscellaneous Disaster Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 172
Recipients of Miscellaneous Disaster Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $1,915,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Michael J Garrow | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $7,142 |
82 | Daniel Paradis | Richford, VT 05476 | $7,110 |
83 | Ballard Acres | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $7,066 |
84 | Grant Gorton | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $6,750 |
85 | Joseph J & Christie Montagne | Swanton, VT 05488 | $6,728 |
86 | Franklin G & Mary Yates | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $6,724 |
87 | Daren Sizen | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $6,706 |
88 | Mark Lussier F Dba Mississiquoi | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $6,662 |
89 | Mountain View Dairy | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $6,586 |
90 | Ronnie & Carol Sweet | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $6,462 |
91 | Wayne & Nancy Fiske | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $6,446 |
92 | Heyer Hills Farm | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $6,424 |
93 | Holyoke Farm | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $6,376 |
94 | Pierre Parent | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $6,314 |
95 | Ronald Paradis | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $6,257 |
96 | Carpsdale Farms Ltd | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $6,198 |
97 | James & Jennifer Hubbard | Swanton, VT 05488 | $6,006 |
98 | David Woods | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $5,890 |
99 | Lloyd Lumbra Jr | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $5,825 |
100 | Weld Farms LLC | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $5,825 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”