Dairy Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 105
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $7,058,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | James A Blodgett | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $16,451 |
82 | Dawn M Blodgett | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $16,451 |
83 | Rockledge Maple Trust | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $15,455 |
84 | Amy Calleen Ferris | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $14,002 |
85 | Randall Alan Ferris | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $13,367 |
86 | Paul-lin Dairy LLC | E Fairfield, VT 05448 | $12,334 |
87 | Ronnie Joseph Sweet II | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $12,201 |
88 | Cecile Vosburg | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $11,830 |
89 | Mark Paul Vosburg | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $11,830 |
90 | Michael Menard | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $11,387 |
91 | William & Karen Stygles | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $11,191 |
92 | Beth G Choiniere | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $11,108 |
93 | Guy Choiniere | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $11,108 |
94 | Leon & Linda Benoit | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $10,724 |
95 | A C Dairy | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $10,712 |
96 | Mountain View Dairy | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $8,930 |
97 | Edward A Choiniere | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $8,873 |
98 | Tyler G Webb | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $7,331 |
99 | Thomas J & Mary Machia | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $3,860 |
100 | John & Margie Barabe | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $2,906 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”