Total Conservation Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 266

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $5,092,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
81Robert & Elizabeth ArchambaultEnosburg Falls, VT 05450$17,269
82Margaret RyanEnosburg Falls, VT 05450$17,250
83Mark GagneSwanton, VT 05488$17,087
84Raymonde ChoiniereHighgate Center, VT 05459$16,986
85Stephen HarrnessEnosburg Falls, VT 05450$16,801
86Brian Rowell Dba Rowell FarmsHighgate Center, VT 05459$16,610
87Edward & James Bryan Thompson ParEnosburg Falls, VT 05450$16,039
88Daniel & Karen FortinSwanton, VT 05488$15,466
89Cody L'esperanceSheldon, VT 05483$15,307
90James G Welch Living Trust - James WelchColchester, VT 05446$15,157
91Dalestead Farm And Maple LLCEnosburg Falls, VT 05450$14,950
92Richard & Julie LongwaySwanton, VT 05488$14,815
93Theodore YandowSwanton, VT 05488$14,677
94Paul De La BruereSwanton, VT 05488$14,517
95Timothy GeddesEast Fairfield, VT 05448$14,436
96Lawrence & Brenda RainvilleHighgate Center, VT 05459$14,015
97Hayes Farm IncEnosburg Falls, VT 05450$13,701
98Robert St PierreRichford, VT 05476$13,682
99Yves & Claire GodboutRichford, VT 05476$13,513
100Newton Farms IncSaint Albans, VT 05478$13,252

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag