Total Conservation Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 266
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $5,092,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ernest & Rolande Fortin | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $13,105 |
102 | S&b Bessette Dairy LLC | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $12,864 |
103 | Robert & Sandra Manning | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $12,818 |
104 | Frederick & Betty Ryan | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $12,695 |
105 | Kanes Scenic River Farms LLC | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $12,314 |
106 | Carroll &/or Darlene Wright | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $12,312 |
107 | Mary Jean Cox | Long Beach, CA 90808 | $12,110 |
108 | Douglas Weld | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $11,981 |
109 | Andre Lapierre | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $11,268 |
110 | Philip E Playful | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $11,001 |
111 | Daniel Brosseau | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $10,967 |
112 | Linda Whitney | Richford, VT 05476 | $10,940 |
113 | David Marchant & Jane Sorensen | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $10,658 |
114 | Maurice & Pierrette Parent | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $10,577 |
115 | Howmars Farm | Franklin, VT 05457 | $10,441 |
116 | George Ste Marie | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $10,368 |
117 | Towle Neighborhood Road Farm | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $10,071 |
118 | Denis & Janice Bourbeau | Swanton, VT 05488 | $9,946 |
119 | N James Benjamin Jr | Essex Junction, VT 05452 | $9,878 |
120 | Misty Maples Farm Inc | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $9,726 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”