Total Commodity Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 297
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $8,574,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Poppy And Rosemary's Farm LLC | Swanton, VT 05488 | $9,537 |
122 | B & B, LLC | Franklin, VT 05457 | $9,041 |
123 | Edward A Choiniere | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $8,959 |
124 | Robert T Morrill | Milton, VT 05468 | $8,940 |
125 | Bourbeau & Sons Inc | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $7,788 |
126 | William J Derosia | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $7,538 |
127 | Johnson's Mountain View Maples LLC | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $7,412 |
128 | Greg Shover | Shelburne, VT 05482 | $7,334 |
129 | Thomas J & Mary Machia | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $7,325 |
130 | Grice Brook Development Corporation | St Albans, VT 05478 | $7,033 |
131 | Kermit White | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $6,401 |
132 | Fortin Farm | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $6,244 |
133 | Chad Parent | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $6,133 |
134 | Seven Saplings Farm Inc | Richford, VT 05476 | $6,098 |
135 | Carlton Bertrand Jr | Swanton, VT 05488 | $5,906 |
136 | Connor Maple Farm, LLC | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $5,892 |
137 | Edmund Rainville | Highgate, VT 05459 | $5,844 |
138 | Daniel Leclair | South Burlington, VT 05403 | $5,309 |
139 | Craig A Mayo | North Troy, VT 05859 | $5,175 |
140 | Eric Sloan | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $4,918 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”