Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 297
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $303,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Lawrence & Brenda Rainville | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $39 |
142 | Philip & Suzanne Parent | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $39 |
143 | Alan Thomas | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $38 |
144 | Stonehouse Farms Inc | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $36 |
145 | Carolyn Boomhower | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $36 |
146 | Charles & Annie Purrier | Montgomery Center, VT 05471 | $36 |
147 | Mark Lussier F Dba Mississiquoi | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $35 |
148 | Patrick & Paula Howrigan | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $35 |
149 | Chester Parsons | Richford, VT 05476 | $34 |
150 | Ronald Paradis | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $34 |
151 | Thomas Minor | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $33 |
152 | Francis Hall | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $33 |
153 | Franklin G & Mary Yates | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $33 |
154 | Michael Benjamin | Franklin, VT 05457 | $32 |
155 | Heyer Hills Farm | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $32 |
156 | Edward & Carol Mahoney | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $31 |
157 | George & Johanna Godin | Franklin, VT 05457 | $30 |
158 | Gary G Geddes | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $29 |
159 | Eric Dandurand | Franklin, VT 05457 | $28 |
160 | Ballard Acres | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $28 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”