Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, Vermont
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Vermont, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 221
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $2,760,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Minor Family Maple LLC | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $1,012 |
142 | Garry & Eileen Trudell | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $1,010 |
143 | A C Dairy | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $991 |
144 | Edward A Choiniere | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $984 |
145 | Dean Stockman | Richford, VT 05476 | $977 |
146 | Godfreys Sugar House | Montgomery Center, VT 05471 | $905 |
147 | Two Brothers Maple LLC | Richford, VT 05476 | $904 |
148 | Michael Menard | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $888 |
149 | Ledge View Maple LLC | Jeffersonville, VT 05464 | $819 |
150 | David Marchant & Jane Sorensen Dba River Berry Far | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $814 |
151 | Brian Rowell Dba Rowell Farms | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $812 |
152 | , | $811 | |
153 | Dale F Cahill | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $781 |
154 | Claude Rainville | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $775 |
155 | Rock Allen | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $774 |
156 | Julie Wolcott | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $766 |
157 | Entropy Mauck | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $759 |
158 | , | $750 | |
159 | , | $750 | |
160 | Randall J Reed | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $739 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”