Total Conservation Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 266
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $5,092,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Thomas Lawyer | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $7,000 |
142 | Benoit Pothier | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $7,000 |
143 | Gary Gilmond | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $7,000 |
144 | Wayne King | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $7,000 |
145 | Paul & Patricia Brodeur | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $7,000 |
146 | Mark Lussier F Dba Mississiquoi | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $7,000 |
147 | Wayne & Nancy Fiske | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $7,000 |
148 | Stephen &or Alesia White | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $7,000 |
149 | Cadieux Brothers | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $7,000 |
150 | Daniel Rico | Richford, VT 05476 | $6,859 |
151 | Patrick Cochran | Derby, VT 05829 | $6,805 |
152 | Gregory & Celeste Kane-stebbins | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $6,759 |
153 | Frank Adams | Richford, VT 05476 | $6,632 |
154 | Nelson Dairies West LLC | Swanton, VT 05488 | $6,580 |
155 | Lyle & Dora Hurtubise | Richford, VT 05476 | $6,513 |
156 | Remi Bourdeau | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $6,477 |
157 | Ernest & Robert Sweet | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $6,442 |
158 | Chester Parsons | Richford, VT 05476 | $6,190 |
159 | George Vanvlaanderen | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $6,188 |
160 | Shirley Harrness | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $6,014 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”