Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 297
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $303,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brendan Schreindorfer | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $27,753 |
2 | Boissonneault Family Farm Inc | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $26,811 |
3 | Bittersweet Farm Of Vermont LLC | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $18,570 |
4 | Benjamin D Williams | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $17,584 |
5 | James R. Callan | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $17,414 |
6 | Misty Maples Farm Inc | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $16,486 |
7 | Kelly R Stone | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $15,885 |
8 | Bouchard Family Dairy LLC | Franklin, VT 05457 | $14,286 |
9 | Geoffrey C. Sweeney Dba Sweeney Farm | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $12,263 |
10 | Damien & Jessica Boomhower | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $11,487 |
11 | David Callan | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $9,784 |
12 | , | $9,145 | |
13 | , | $8,618 | |
14 | Howmars Farm | Franklin, VT 05457 | $8,137 |
15 | Tyler G Webb | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $6,214 |
16 | Ferdinand Gamache | Swanton, VT 05488 | $6,161 |
17 | Michael Menard | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $5,884 |
18 | John Christopher Tiffany | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $5,543 |
19 | Cassondra Tiffany | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $5,222 |
20 | A C Dairy | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $4,947 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>