Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 94
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $49,968 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Thomas & Cecile Branon | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $1,500 |
2 | Lawrence F Sloan Jr | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $1,500 |
3 | Benjamin D Williams | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $1,500 |
4 | Howrigan's Maple Orchard, LLC | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $1,500 |
5 | Boissonneault Family Farm Inc | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $1,500 |
6 | Gervais Family Maple LLC | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $1,491 |
7 | Branons West View Maples LLC | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $1,363 |
8 | Howmars Farm | Franklin, VT 05457 | $1,124 |
9 | Richard Maurice Hoburn Sr | Franklin, VT 05457 | $1,108 |
10 | Tiffany Brothers Partnership | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $1,049 |
11 | Misty Maples Farm Inc | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $1,043 |
12 | Minor Family Maple LLC | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $1,012 |
13 | Garry & Eileen Trudell | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $1,010 |
14 | Kelly R Stone | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $991 |
15 | Godfreys Sugar House | Montgomery Center, VT 05471 | $905 |
16 | Two Brothers Maple LLC | Richford, VT 05476 | $904 |
17 | Linda L Sweet | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $875 |
18 | Ledge View Maple LLC | Jeffersonville, VT 05464 | $819 |
19 | , | $811 | |
20 | Julie Wolcott | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $766 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>