Dairy Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 106
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $846,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Leach Farms Inc | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $95,454 |
2 | Mark & Amanda St Pierre | Richford, VT 05476 | $90,676 |
3 | H J & A Howrigan & Sons Inc | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $41,806 |
4 | Daren & Laura Sizen | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $23,217 |
5 | Nelson Dairies West LLC | Swanton, VT 05488 | $20,903 |
6 | Boissonneault Family Farm Inc | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $18,186 |
7 | Choquette Dairy LLC | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $15,394 |
8 | Stebbinshire Farms Inc | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $15,336 |
9 | Pleasant Acre Farms LLC | Swanton, VT 05488 | $14,058 |
10 | Cedric & Dawn White | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $12,902 |
11 | Linda Benoit | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $12,154 |
12 | Brendan Schreindorfer | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $11,750 |
13 | George Oscar III & Debra Stebbins | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $10,545 |
14 | Brouillette Farms Inc | Richford, VT 05476 | $10,452 |
15 | Jacques & Mariel Parent | Swanton, VT 05488 | $10,452 |
16 | Bess-view Farm | Swanton, VT 05488 | $10,452 |
17 | Kanes Scenic River Farms LLC | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $10,452 |
18 | Albert & Lynette Fresn | Swanton, VT 05488 | $10,452 |
19 | Longway Farms LLC | Swanton, VT 05488 | $10,452 |
20 | Machia & Sons Dairy LLC | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $10,452 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>