Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, Vermont
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Vermont, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,530
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $116,807,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Patrick & Paula Howrigan | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $752,854 |
22 | Brian Rowell Dba Rowell Farms | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $733,254 |
23 | Albert & Lynette Fresn | Swanton, VT 05488 | $702,967 |
24 | Ronald J & Cheryl Machia | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $702,036 |
25 | David & Peggy Howrigan | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $700,598 |
26 | Bourbeau & Sons Inc | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $691,698 |
27 | Copper Hill Farm, LLC | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $670,227 |
28 | Dean Wright Dba Wright Farm | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $660,672 |
29 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $652,710 |
30 | Stebbinshire Farms Inc | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $651,821 |
31 | Mountain View Dairy | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $636,368 |
32 | Michael Montagne | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $617,908 |
33 | Ridgeview Farm Inc | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $598,845 |
34 | Robert P Parent And Son LLC | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $596,290 |
35 | Aires-hill Farm Inc | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $583,199 |
36 | S&b Bessette Dairy LLC | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $543,531 |
37 | Richard & Julie Longway | Swanton, VT 05488 | $534,627 |
38 | Green Mountain Forest Products In | Highgate Ctr, VT 05459 | $530,091 |
39 | Leon & Linda Benoit | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $514,186 |
40 | Magnan Bros Maquam Shore Dairy LLC | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $505,237 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”