Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, Vermont
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Vermont, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 330
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $10,672,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Laroche Dairy & Son LLC | Highgate Ctr, VT 05459 | $130,119 |
22 | Patrick & Paula Howrigan | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $129,323 |
23 | Robert & Linda Sweet | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $127,956 |
24 | B & T Black Creek Farms Ltd | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $125,864 |
25 | L F Hurtubise & Sons Inc | Richford, VT 05476 | $123,486 |
26 | Magnan Bros Maquam Shore Dairy LLC | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $122,203 |
27 | Copper Hill Farm, LLC | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $121,707 |
28 | Aires-hill Farm Inc | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $119,404 |
29 | Duhamel Family Farm LLC | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $118,847 |
30 | Borderview Farm LLC | Franklin, VT 05457 | $118,800 |
31 | Ballard Acres LLC | St Albans, VT 05478 | $117,417 |
32 | Robert P Parent And Son LLC | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $117,396 |
33 | Dodd Farms | Franklin, VT 05457 | $117,298 |
34 | Mr Dustin J Machia | Swanton, VT 05488 | $115,387 |
35 | Green Mountain Dairy Farm LLC | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $113,008 |
36 | Corey's Maple Orchard | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $93,065 |
37 | Linda Benoit | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $91,646 |
38 | Choquette Dairy LLC | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $79,608 |
39 | Brian Rowell Dba Rowell Farms | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $75,785 |
40 | Daren & Laura Sizen | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $75,426 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”