Loan Deficiency in Franklin County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 302
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $5,591,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert P & Linda Parent | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $58,684 |
22 | Terry & Juliette Rice | Swanton, VT 05488 | $57,611 |
23 | Pleasant Acre Farms LLC | Swanton, VT 05488 | $56,580 |
24 | Meghanbrooke Dairy LLC | St Albans Bay, VT 05481 | $53,830 |
25 | Germain Bourdeau | Swanton, VT 05488 | $53,152 |
26 | Andre Gagne | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $50,730 |
27 | Rene Boissoneault | Swanton, VT 05488 | $48,507 |
28 | Bourbeau & Sons Inc | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $47,891 |
29 | Duhamel Farm Partnership | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $47,327 |
30 | Stephen & Shirley Harrness | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $45,041 |
31 | Heath & Lora Mcallister | Swanton, VT 05488 | $44,630 |
32 | Mountain View Dairy | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $43,986 |
33 | Dodd Farms | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $43,228 |
34 | Magnan Bros Dairy Inc | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $43,071 |
35 | Albert & Lynette Fresn | Swanton, VT 05488 | $42,624 |
36 | Maplewood Dairy Farm | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $42,056 |
37 | David M Dragon | Franklin, VT 05457 | $41,202 |
38 | James & Jennifer Hubbard | Swanton, VT 05488 | $38,429 |
39 | Kanes Scenic River Farms LLC | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $37,691 |
40 | M C Fortin Farm | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $36,799 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”