Total Conservation Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 46
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $92,340 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Cody L'esperance | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $1,741 |
22 | Rockledge Maple Trust | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $1,733 |
23 | Carol Dunsmore | Swanton, VT 05488 | $1,659 |
24 | Guy Choiniere | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $1,659 |
25 | J Christopher Wagner | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $1,588 |
26 | Adrian & Marie Rainville | Franklin, VT 05457 | $1,468 |
27 | Larry Trombley | Swanton, VT 05488 | $1,103 |
28 | Dwight Callan | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $1,091 |
29 | Jeff Boissoneault | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $1,055 |
30 | Paul Langelier | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $969 |
31 | James G Welch Living Trust - James Welch | Colchester, VT 05446 | $921 |
32 | Kinney Flood Acres LLC | East Berkshire, VT 05447 | $914 |
33 | Brian Rowell Dba Rowell Farms | Highgate Center, VT 05459 | $812 |
34 | Claude Rainville | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $775 |
35 | Tyler G Webb | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $750 |
36 | Ronnie Joseph Sweet II | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $746 |
37 | Kanes Scenic River Farms LLC | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $724 |
38 | Toby Alexander | Milton, VT 05468 | $653 |
39 | Paul De La Bruere | Swanton, VT 05488 | $639 |
40 | David Marchant & Jane Sorensen Dba River Berry Far | Fairfax, VT 05454 | $564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”