Total Conservation Programs in Franklin County, Vermont, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 46
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Franklin County, Vermont totaled $182,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tyrone Shaw | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $31,709 |
2 | Suzanne Marie Parent | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $23,958 |
3 | Philip L Parent | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $23,946 |
4 | , | $22,366 | |
5 | Riverbend Farm, LLC | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $11,105 |
6 | , | $8,955 | |
7 | Dale F Cahill | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $7,454 |
8 | Michael & Kathleen Palmer | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $6,628 |
9 | David & Dorothy Dunsmore | Swanton, VT 05488 | $3,680 |
10 | David & Clare Beebe | Swanton, VT 05488 | $3,128 |
11 | Jacques & Mariel Parent | Swanton, VT 05488 | $2,250 |
12 | Jb3 LLC | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $2,214 |
13 | Dalestead Farm And Maple LLC | Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 | $1,981 |
14 | Howrigans H Bar 9 Dairy, LLC | Fairfield, VT 05455 | $1,951 |
15 | Timothy Geddes | East Fairfield, VT 05448 | $1,788 |
16 | Arnold & Linda Mercy | Montgomery Center, VT 05471 | $1,766 |
17 | Kathleen Richards-babcock | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $1,759 |
18 | Cody L'esperance | Sheldon, VT 05483 | $1,741 |
19 | Rockledge Maple Trust | Saint Albans, VT 05478 | $1,733 |
20 | Carol Dunsmore | Swanton, VT 05488 | $1,659 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>