Farm Subsidy information
Lamoille County, Vermont
Total Subsidies in Lamoille County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 390
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lamoille County, Vermont totaled $15,156,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Clarence E Towne Sr | Morrisville, VT 05661 | $20,325 |
102 | Jason Boissoneault | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $20,319 |
103 | Wayne Stearns | Johnson, VT 05656 | $19,885 |
104 | Lauren Tilton | Waterville, VT 05492 | $18,615 |
105 | Dorothy Gates | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $18,114 |
106 | Mark Boyden | Cambridge, VT 05444 | $18,035 |
107 | Eden's Echo Forest Management Co | Eden Mills, VT 05653 | $17,649 |
108 | Mary Porter | Waterville, VT 05492 | $17,647 |
109 | Arthur Meade | Morrisville, VT 05661 | $17,383 |
110 | Fernand Lacasse | Wolcott, VT 05680 | $16,614 |
111 | Ronald Masse | Wolcott, VT 05680 | $16,242 |
112 | Virginia Neel | Stowe, VT 05672 | $15,286 |
113 | Robert Nuzzo | Jeffersonville, VT 05464 | $14,815 |
114 | Rick Marsh | Jeffersonville, VT 05464 | $14,741 |
115 | Thomas Younkman | Hyde Park, VT 05655 | $14,726 |
116 | Geoffrey Bentley | Carlisle, MA 01741 | $14,499 |
117 | Maple Sugar Mountain LLC | Waterville, VT 05492 | $14,458 |
118 | David Godfrey | Derby Line, VT 05830 | $14,171 |
119 | Meade | Morrisville, VT 05661 | $13,927 |
120 | Lamoille Valley Prop Owners Asso | Simsbury, CT 06070 | $13,842 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”