Total Commodity Programs in Orange County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 467
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Orange County, Vermont totaled $21,634,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Pease Family Farm | Tunbridge, VT 05077 | $199,268 |
22 | Lynn & Alice Wakefield | Braintree, VT 05060 | $198,035 |
23 | T B Lincoln Loggers Inc | Northfield Falls, VT 05664 | $191,013 |
24 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $171,651 |
25 | Roy Sweet | Topsham, VT 05076 | $165,769 |
26 | Hillcrest Farms, LLC | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $160,596 |
27 | Robert & Tay Simpson | Braintree, VT 05060 | $153,201 |
28 | Rebecc Rice Esq. | Rutland, VT 05701 | $140,313 |
29 | Cr Farm Inc | Newbury, VT 05051 | $138,165 |
30 | Charles D White | Corinth, VT 05039 | $136,021 |
31 | Vermont Technical College | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $128,458 |
32 | Jennifer Lambert | Washington, VT 05675 | $127,327 |
33 | David Pullman | Williamstown, VT 05679 | $121,770 |
34 | Oughta Be Farm Llp | Chelsea, VT 05038 | $115,835 |
35 | Warren & Idella Preston | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $112,321 |
36 | Pineville Farm | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $107,642 |
37 | Margaret Gladstone | Bradford, VT 05033 | $107,430 |
38 | David Pullman | Williamstown, VT 05679 | $104,942 |
39 | Bruce H Martin | Williamstown, VT 05679 | $104,592 |
40 | Brotherly Farm Organic LLC | Brookfield, VT 05036 | $101,611 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”