Farm Subsidy information
Orange County, Vermont
Total Subsidies in Orange County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 542
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Orange County, Vermont totaled $25,346,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kenneth & Sallyann Carson | Bradford, VT 05033 | $122,405 |
42 | David Pullman | Williamstown, VT 05679 | $121,770 |
43 | Margaret Gladstone | Bradford, VT 05033 | $120,052 |
44 | Pineville Farm | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $119,126 |
45 | Bruce H Martin | Williamstown, VT 05679 | $117,327 |
46 | Oughta Be Farm Llp | Chelsea, VT 05038 | $115,835 |
47 | Gerald Smith II | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $108,922 |
48 | Kenneth Preston | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $105,988 |
49 | Duane A Williams | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $102,418 |
50 | Brotherly Farm Organic LLC | Brookfield, VT 05036 | $101,611 |
51 | S John Osha | Randolph Center, VT 05061 | $101,324 |
52 | Eugene J Bedard | Orange, VT 05641 | $98,791 |
53 | Fisk Trucking LLC | Bradford, VT 05033 | $92,366 |
54 | Lucas Vaughan | South Ryegate, VT 05069 | $90,579 |
55 | Richard Devins | Bradford, VT 05033 | $89,413 |
56 | Sarah Putnam | Newbury, VT 05051 | $89,155 |
57 | Robert A Swenson | Fairlee, VT 05045 | $88,590 |
58 | Howacres Inc | Tunbridge, VT 05077 | $87,601 |
59 | Pierson Farm | Bradford, VT 05033 | $87,559 |
60 | White Farm | Corinth, VT 05039 | $84,725 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”