Farm Subsidy information
Orleans County, Vermont
Total Subsidies in Orleans County, Vermont, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 120
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Orleans County, Vermont totaled $792,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Bathalon | Westfield, VT 05874 | $6,879 |
22 | Patrick & Karen O'donnell | Westfield, VT 05874 | $6,704 |
23 | Marcella Guillette | Newport, VT 05855 | $6,624 |
24 | Therrien Farm Inc | North Troy, VT 05859 | $6,611 |
25 | Michael Boudreau | Irasburg, VT 05845 | $6,528 |
26 | Lori Royer | Orleans, VT 05860 | $6,405 |
27 | Missisquoi Valley Farm LLC | Westfield, VT 05874 | $6,303 |
28 | Jamie Rivers | Newport, VT 05855 | $6,020 |
29 | John G Morin | Derby Line, VT 05830 | $5,413 |
30 | Andrew D Delabruere | Derby, VT 05829 | $4,683 |
31 | Adrian Fortin | Newport, VT 05855 | $4,570 |
32 | James Gratton | West Charleston, VT 05872 | $4,559 |
33 | Alan & Judith Davis | East Charleston, VT 05833 | $4,468 |
34 | Echo Lake Farm LLC | West Charleston, VT 05872 | $4,280 |
35 | James Jones | Craftsbury, VT 05826 | $4,053 |
36 | Daniel Michaud | Greensboro Bend, VT 05842 | $3,908 |
37 | Dana Burkewitz | Irasburg, VT 05845 | $3,714 |
38 | Denise B Pothier | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $3,525 |
39 | Marcel & Gaetane Patenaude | Derby Line, VT 05830 | $3,514 |
40 | Robert L Lepage Jr | Newport, VT 05855 | $3,435 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”