Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Orleans County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 405
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Orleans County, Vermont totaled $1,194,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Alfred Proctor III | North Troy, VT 05859 | $2,721 |
102 | Daniel P Royer | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $2,718 |
103 | Daniel J Paquin | Williamstown, VT 05679 | $2,712 |
104 | Merri B Paquin | Williamstown, VT 05679 | $2,712 |
105 | Julie Perron | Glover, VT 05839 | $2,700 |
106 | Denis P Poutre | Irasburg, VT 05845 | $2,700 |
107 | Vivian Desrochers | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $2,657 |
108 | Armand Pion | North Troy, VT 05859 | $2,646 |
109 | Jean Hammond | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $2,644 |
110 | Jayne Valeria Chase | Derby Line, VT 05830 | $2,583 |
111 | Linda Driver | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $2,520 |
112 | Lowell Urie | Craftsbury Common, VT 05827 | $2,498 |
113 | Robert Bathalon | Westfield, VT 05874 | $2,465 |
114 | Clara Nadeau | Derby, VT 05829 | $2,453 |
115 | Dale Nadeau | Derby, VT 05829 | $2,453 |
116 | Jeffrey Smith | Irasburg, VT 05845 | $2,453 |
117 | Rodrigue Pellerin | Orleans, VT 05860 | $2,415 |
118 | James Ashworth | West Glover, VT 05875 | $2,378 |
119 | Wayne E Doncaster Sr | Irasburg, VT 05845 | $2,378 |
120 | Ronald Perkins | Orleans, VT 05860 | $2,313 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”