Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Orleans County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 54
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Orleans County, Vermont totaled $1,064,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Durwood Blay | Westfield, VT 05874 | $15,408 |
22 | Fernand Lanoue | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $15,121 |
23 | Crazy 8 Farm Inc | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $15,017 |
24 | Wright & Collins Farm | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $14,386 |
25 | Phillip Poutre Jr | Barton, VT 05822 | $14,261 |
26 | Dunn Mitchell & Sandra | Lowell, VT 05847 | $13,857 |
27 | Leonard Hammond | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $13,317 |
28 | Jeffrey Smith | Irasburg, VT 05845 | $12,552 |
29 | Ronald Pion | Lowell, VT 05847 | $12,462 |
30 | Hurdhaven | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $8,000 |
31 | Roger Meunier | Newport, VT 05855 | $7,779 |
32 | Scott Warthin | Newport, VT 05855 | $6,150 |
33 | Dr Thomas Moseley | Newport, VT 05855 | $5,813 |
34 | Dexter Randall | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $5,732 |
35 | Alfred Proctor III | North Troy, VT 05859 | $5,340 |
36 | Aaron Nadeau | Derby, VT 05829 | $4,055 |
37 | Everett Driver | Newport Center, VT 05857 | $3,866 |
38 | Harold Rowlee | Derby, VT 05829 | $3,713 |
39 | Philip Rowell | Albany, VT 05820 | $3,542 |
40 | Delfavero Richard & Barbara | Derby, VT 05829 | $3,385 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”