Conservation Reserve Program in Rutland County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 81
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Rutland County, Vermont totaled $1,463,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Vermont Natural Beef, LLC | Benson, VT 05743 | $9,642 |
42 | Highland Trust LLC | South Burlington, VT 05403 | $9,296 |
43 | Elmer A Gombosi Farm | Milford, NJ 08848 | $9,185 |
44 | Deceased Elsa Potter | Burlington, VT 05402 | $7,970 |
45 | Sisters Of Mercy Of The Americas Northeast Communi | Benson, VT 05743 | $7,574 |
46 | Theodore Grembowicz | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $6,604 |
47 | Cadwell Brothers Trust | Shelburne, VT 05482 | $6,464 |
48 | Chambers Farm LLC | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $6,362 |
49 | Gerald Quenneville | Whiting, VT 05778 | $6,351 |
50 | Maple Ridge Meats LLC | Benson, VT 05743 | $6,064 |
51 | Mccullough Burton And/or Shirley | Proctor, VT 05765 | $5,992 |
52 | Lewis Edward A | Poultney, VT 05764 | $5,612 |
53 | Mark Teetor | Poultney, VT 05764 | $4,532 |
54 | John K Krupp | West Haven, VT 05743 | $4,209 |
55 | Natale Smith | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $4,034 |
56 | Marybeth E Wetherby | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $3,792 |
57 | Roblee Farm Inc | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $3,580 |
58 | Carl Vladyka | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $3,528 |
59 | Claycreek Farm | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $3,260 |
60 | Burton H Mccullough Jr | Proctor, VT 05765 | $3,171 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”