Market Loss Assistance Program in Rutland County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 204
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Rutland County, Vermont totaled $1,677,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Spencer Bros | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $15,138 |
42 | Burton H Mccullough | Proctor, VT 05765 | $15,117 |
43 | Robert C Raiche Sr | West Rutland, VT 05777 | $15,022 |
44 | Priscilla Hard | Florence, VT 05744 | $14,850 |
45 | Cash R Ruane | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $14,697 |
46 | Wilbur & Elizabeth Raiche | Tinmouth, VT 05773 | $14,442 |
47 | Steven E Waite | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $14,308 |
48 | Jesse D Billings III | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $14,304 |
49 | Carl Vladyka | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $14,296 |
50 | Natale Smith | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $14,092 |
51 | Pinkowski Corner Farm | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $13,984 |
52 | Edward Congdon & Sons | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $13,968 |
53 | Donald B Wood | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $13,507 |
54 | Mark & Tracey Fitzgerald | West Rutland, VT 05777 | $13,272 |
55 | Michael Pettis | West Haven, VT 05743 | $12,996 |
56 | Lowell W Seward Estate | East Wallingford, VT 05742 | $12,915 |
57 | Chambers Phyllis & Andrew | North Clarendon, VT 05759 | $12,733 |
58 | Paul M Lussier | Benson, VT 05743 | $12,614 |
59 | John W Malcolm | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $12,261 |
60 | David H Mills Jr | Brandon, VT 05733 | $11,713 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”