Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Rutland County, Vermont, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 156
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Rutland County, Vermont totaled $1,913,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Alan D Davenport | Wallingford, VT 05773 | $9,835 |
62 | Everett Hansen | Poultney, VT 05764 | $9,784 |
63 | Rodney & Alida Tarbell | Middletown Springs, VT 05757 | $9,610 |
64 | Leo P Branchaud | Middletown Springs, VT 05757 | $9,437 |
65 | Priscilla Hard | Florence, VT 05744 | $9,338 |
66 | Alfred Wiederhold | Benson, VT 05743 | $9,257 |
67 | George Rogers | Fair Haven, VT 05743 | $9,254 |
68 | Carmella Carter | Pittsford, VT 05763 | $9,063 |
69 | Raymond R Duquette Sr | West Pawlet, VT 05775 | $8,948 |
70 | Charles & Karen Leroy | Whiting, VT 05778 | $8,928 |
71 | Natale Smith | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $8,662 |
72 | Marcus Fish Jr | Tinmouth, VT 05773 | $7,944 |
73 | Richard P Browe | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $7,688 |
74 | Paul M Lussier | Benson, VT 05743 | $7,591 |
75 | Martin L Harding II | Brandon, VT 05733 | $7,257 |
76 | Wilbur & Elizabeth Raiche | Tinmouth, VT 05773 | $7,232 |
77 | Robert N Wood | West Haven, VT 05743 | $7,207 |
78 | John A Eugair | Pittsford, VT 05763 | $7,128 |
79 | Roblee Farm Inc | Pawlet, VT 05761 | $7,100 |
80 | Peter H Gilmore | Tinmouth, VT 05773 | $6,985 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”